下载 United States Supreme Court cases - v1.0.6

下载 United States Supreme Court cases - v1.0.6
Package Name com.soft24hors.dictionary.united.states.supreme.court.cases
Category ,
Latest Version 1.0.6
Get it On Google Play
Update April 08, 2020 (5 years ago)

您听说过United States Supreme Court cases - v1.0.6 Duolingo v5.35.4 APK + MOD (Premium/All 已解锁) MOD APK, Mobile C [ C/C++ Compiler ], HSK Online — HSK Study and Exams, WordUp Vocabulary, Words Booster: Learn Languages, LingoDeer v2.99.137 APK + MOD (Premium 已解锁) MOD APK,是类别教育 2中最酷的应用之一。

当然,您知道并非所有游戏或应用程序都兼容所有手机。游戏或应用程序有时在您的设备上不可用,这取决于系统版本。Android操作系统,屏幕分辨率或国家/地区Google Play允许访问。这就是APKPanda提供Android APK文件供您下载且不遵守这些限制的原因。>
United States Supreme Court cases - v1.0.6的最新版本为1.0.6,发行日期为2019-02-21,大小为18.8 MB。由24Hours开发,United States Supreme Court cases - v1.0.6至少需要Android版本。因此,如有必要,您必须更新手机。

负载量很大,大约有1000次下载。您可以根据需要更新已单独下载或安装在Android设备上的应用程序。更新应用程序使您可以访问最新功能,并提高应用程序的安全性和稳定性。

United States Supreme Court cases - v1.0.6

United States Supreme Court cases

The free application "United States Supreme Court cases" is very friendly, it has a beautiful and simple interface. The best choice for a pocket dictionary that is always at hand. From which you can learn a lot of new and interesting things, for example, that:

Shaffer v. Heitner
Shaffer v. Heitner, 433 U.S. 186 (1977), is a United States corporate law case in which the Supreme Court of the United States established that a defendant's ownership of stock in a corporation incorporated within a state, without more, is insufficient to allow that state courts to exercise jurisdiction over the defendant. The case set forth a framework for evaluating when a defendant will be deemed to have minimum contacts with the forum state sufficient for the exercise of jurisdiction to be consistent with due process under the Fourteenth Amendment.

Bowen v. Georgetown University Hospital
Bowen v. Georgetown University Hospital, 488 U.S. 204 (1988), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that agencies should not be presumed to have the power to promulgate retroactive rules unless that power is expressly authorized by Congress. Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote for a unanimous court that the Secretary of Health and Human Services had exceeded his rulemaking authority under the Medicare Act in promulgating a wage index rule in 1984 under which he would recoup Medicare reimbursements paid to hospitals, including Georgetown University Hospital, that had been disbursed since 1981 according to the pre-1984 rule. Justice Antonin Scalia concurred in the judgment, writing separately that, in addition to the particular language of the Medicare Act, the Administrative Procedure Act more broadly prohibits retroactive rulemaking because it defines rules as having exclusively future effect, as opposed to adjudicative orders.



Features:
• The dictionary works offline - you do not need an internet connection. Access to articles (descriptions) offline, without an Internet connection (except for photographs);
• Very quick search for descriptions. Equipped with a quick dynamic search function - the dictionary will start searching for words during input;
• Unlimited number of notes (favorites);
• Bookmark - you can add descriptions to your favorites list by clicking on the asterisk icon;
• Manage bookmark lists - you can edit your bookmark lists or clear them;
• Search History;
• Voice search;
• Compatible with modern versions of Android devices;
• Very efficient, fast and good performance;
• An easy way to share with friends;
• The application is very easy to use, fast and with extensive content;
• Automatic free updates every time new terms are added;
• The directory "United States Supreme Court cases" is designed to occupy as little memory as possible.

Features Premium:
no ads;
photos, images of access offline;
Clear browsing history.

Show more